AUTOMOC slowness compared to qt_wrap_cpp
When using AUTOMOC, I've noticed moc process takes around 3~5 seconds to finish certain header. When using qt_warp_cpp for the same header, it takes fraction of second.
The header files includes some headers from Qt & boost.
The only difference in process arguments in the two modes was that AUTOMOC adds lots of include directories to the moc command, and include directories are network paths. I'm guessing that these include directories are causing this slowness, and they seem to not cause much difference in the moc output.