Commit 5e428389 authored by Brad King's avatar Brad King

Features: Detect Intel C++14 mode more reliably

The `__cplusplus` macro is not defined to the language level reliably.
When simulating MSVC it is always set to `1`.  When simulating GCC it is
set to the lower value of the current language level and the maximum
level supported by the simulated version of GCC (from observation).

For MSVC we already used a combination of `__INTEL_CXX11_MODE__` and
`__cpp_aggregate_nsdmi` to detect C++14 mode.  Extend this for general
use by removing the condition on `_MSC_VER`.
parent 1f848031
......@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ set(DETECT_CXX11 "((__cplusplus >= 201103L) || defined(__INTEL_CXX11_MODE__) ||
#if you are compiling as 98/11/14. So to properly detect C++14 with this version
#we look for the existence of __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ but not __INTEL_CXX11_MODE__
set(DETECT_CXX14 "((__cplusplus >= 201300L) || ((__cplusplus == 201103L) && !defined(__INTEL_CXX11_MODE__)) || ((${DETECT_BUGGY_ICC15}) && defined(__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__) && !defined(__INTEL_CXX11_MODE__) ) || (defined(_MSC_VER) && defined(__INTEL_CXX11_MODE__) && defined(__cpp_aggregate_nsdmi)) )")
set(DETECT_CXX14 "((__cplusplus >= 201300L) || ((__cplusplus == 201103L) && !defined(__INTEL_CXX11_MODE__)) || ((${DETECT_BUGGY_ICC15}) && defined(__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__) && !defined(__INTEL_CXX11_MODE__) ) || (defined(__INTEL_CXX11_MODE__) && defined(__cpp_aggregate_nsdmi)) )")
set(Intel16_CXX14 "__INTEL_COMPILER >= 1600 && ${DETECT_CXX14}")
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment